Trailers
Description
Two planes almost collide after a blinding flash of light paralyzes air traffic controller Dylan Branson for a few seconds. Suspended from his job, Dylan starts to notice an ominous pattern of sounds and events that repeats itself in exactly the same manner every day, ending precisely at 2:22 p.m. Also drawn into a complex relationship with a woman, Dylan must figure out a way to break the power of the past and take control of time itself.
Starring
Awards
Key opinion
2:22 is a visually striking sci-fi romance that centers on an intriguing concept of repeating temporal patterns. While its aesthetic and atmospheric qualities are widely praised, the film suffers from a divisive narrative that struggles to maintain momentum, ultimately collapsing into a clichéd and unsatisfying conclusion.
| Cinematography | Cinematography and production design create a visually spectacular and atmospheric depiction of New York City. | |
| Score | The score and musical choices are frequently cited as beautiful, melancholic, and emotionally resonant. | |
| Acting | The performances are polarizing: some viewers find the lead couple charming and convincing, while others describe the acting as stiff or lacking in emotional depth. | |
| Screenplay | The premise offers an engaging and original take on fate and repetitive algorithms, yet the screenplay is criticized for being thin, clichéd, and prone to unnatural dialogue. | |
| Pacing | The pacing is divisive, with some finding the contemplative tempo rewarding, while others find the film to be prohibitively slow and prone to dragging. | |
| Ending | The ending is widely viewed as a failure, with many critics arguing it shifts abruptly from a subtle mystery into a generic and disappointing melodramatic conclusion. |