← Back to results
Allan Quatermain and the Lost City of Gold
1986 99 min United States of America, Israel PG 12+
★5.4
Adventure, Action, Comedy, Mystery
Director: Gary Nelson
📖 Based on the novel
«Allan Quatermain»
byH. Rider Haggard
Trailers
Description
After his brother Robeson disappears without a trace while exploring Africa in search of a legendary 'white tribe', Allan Quatermain decides to follow in his footsteps to learn what became of him. Soon after arriving, he discovers the Lost City of Gold, controlled by the evil lord Agon, and mined by his legions of white slaves.
US Gross:
$3.75M
Worldwide:
$3.75M
Starring
Richard Chamberlain
Actor
Sharon Stone
Actor
James Earl Jones
Actor
Awards
Razzie Awards 1988
— Worst Actress
Key opinion
Allan Quatermain and the Lost City of Gold is a polarizing adventure sequel that occupies a middle ground between fun, campy escapism and a failed imitation of the Indiana Jones formula. While some viewers praise its adventurous spirit, vibrant locations, and dedicated cast, others criticize its derivative plot, inconsistent production values, and technical flaws.
| Originality | The film leans heavily on an 'Indiana Jones' template, leading to frequent comparisons that leave Quatermain feeling like an uninspired, derivative shadow of its cinematic rival. | |
| Production | The exotic, vibrant landscapes and well-realized 'Lost City' sets provide a visually appealing backdrop that stands out as a highlight of the production. | |
| Acting | Henry Silva’s performance as the malevolent High Priest Agon serves as a distinct, intimidating presence that effectively anchors the villainous side of the narrative. | |
| Screenplay | Viewers are divided on the screenplay's quality: some find the plot tighter and more engaging than the first film, while others dismiss the storytelling as far-fetched, cliché-ridden, and poorly paced. | |
| Editing | The technical execution sparks disagreement; critics point to visible wires and poor editing as evidence of a low-budget aesthetic, whereas fans argue the action and spectacle are consistently superb. | |
| Acting | Opinions on the cast are split, with some appreciating the chemistry of Chamberlain and Stone, while others describe the acting as inept and lacking the charisma required for the genre. |