← Back to results
Avengers: Age of Ultron
2015 141 min United States of America PG-13 12+
★7.3
Action, Adventure, Science Fiction
Director: Joss Whedon
🎭 Based on
«Avengers»
Trailers
EN
EN
EN
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Description
When Tony Stark tries to jumpstart a dormant peacekeeping program, things go awry and Earth’s Mightiest Heroes are put to the ultimate test as the fate of the planet hangs in the balance. As the villainous Ultron emerges, it is up to The Avengers to stop him from enacting his terrible plans, and soon uneasy alliances and unexpected action pave the way for an epic and unique global adventure.
Budget:
$235M
US Gross:
$459.01M
Worldwide:
$1.41B
Starring
Robert Downey Jr.
Actor
Chris Evans
Actor
Mark Ruffalo
Actor
Awards
Saturn Awards 2016
— Best Costume Design
Georges Awards 2016
— Best Foreign Action Film
MTV Movie & TV Awards 2016
— Best Picture
MTV Movie & TV Awards 2016
— Best Villain
Saturn Awards 2016
— Best Visual Effects
MTV Movie & TV Awards 2016
— Best Fight
Saturn Awards 2016
— Best Costume Design
Saturn Awards 2016
— Best Supporting Actor
Saturn Awards 2016
— Best Comic Book Adaptation
MTV Movie & TV Awards 2016
Key opinion
Avengers: Age of Ultron is widely viewed as a visually impressive but narratively derivative sequel that fails to reach the heights of its predecessor. While fans of the genre enjoy the high-budget spectacle and charisma of the ensemble cast, critics point to a bloated, formulaic plot and inconsistent character development.
| Cinematography | The film effectively delivers high-budget, spectacle-driven action sequences that satisfy fans of the genre. | |
| Screenplay | The central narrative feels repetitive, relying on the same formulaic template and clichéd AI tropes established in the first film. | |
| Pacing | The attempt to balance the backstories and personal emotional arcs of many heroes leads to a cramped, overstuffed narrative structure. | |
| Humor | Critics and fans remain divided on the humor, with some finding it an enjoyable, charming relief, while others view it as forced, childish, and inferior to the first film. | |
| Runtime | Opinions on the runtime vary: some appreciate the fast-moving, two-hour pace, while others argue that the film’s complex character arcs were cut too short and could have benefited from more screen time. |