← Back to results
Back to the Future Part II
1989 108 min United States of America PG 12+
★7.8
Adventure, Comedy, Science Fiction
Director: Robert Zemeckis
Trailers
EN
Teaser
Description
Marty and Doc are at it again as the time-traveling duo head to 2015 to nip some McFly family woes in the bud. But things go awry thanks to bully Biff Tannen and a pesky sports almanac. In a last-ditch attempt to set things straight, Marty finds himself bound for 1955 and face to face with his teenage parents -- again.
Budget:
$40M
US Gross:
$119.36M
Worldwide:
$332M
Starring
Michael J. Fox
Actor
Christopher Lloyd
Actor
Lea Thompson
Actor
Awards
Saturn Awards 1991
— Best Visual Effects
BAFTA 1990
— Best Visual Effects
Saturn Awards 1991
— Best Costume Design
BAFTA 1990
— Best Visual Effects
Academy Awards 1990
— Best Visual Effects
Saturn Awards 1991
— Best Makeup and Hairstyling
Key opinion
Back to the Future Part II is widely regarded as an ambitious, visually imaginative sequel that successfully expands the original film's narrative through complex time-travel mechanics. While some critics view it as a disjointed or overly chaotic bridge between the first and third installments, most fans celebrate it as a quintessential 80s sci-fi adventure with exceptional performances and iconic production design.
| Acting | Michael J. Fox and Christopher Lloyd deliver standout, nuanced performances that anchor the increasingly complex narrative. | |
| Production | The production design, particularly the vibrant and tech-laden vision of 2015, created a lasting cultural impact that transcends the film itself. | |
| Direction | Robert Zemeckis demonstrates masterful direction by balancing dense, interconnected plotlines across multiple time periods without losing the spirit of the original. | |
| Score | Alan Silvestri’s score and the film's innovative visual effects remain technically impressive and add significant energy to the adventure. | |
| Screenplay | The screenplay is praised by many as an ingeniously layered puzzle, while others find the narrative to be overly convoluted and reliant on repetitive plot beats. | |
| Pacing | The film functions as a rewarding, fast-paced bridge for those invested in the trilogy's continuity, though some feel it lacks the standalone charm or coherence of the first installment. |