← Back to results
Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle
2003 106 min United States of America, Brazil PG-13 12+
★5.2
Action, Adventure, Comedy
Director: McG
🎭 Based on
«Charlie's Angels»
Trailers
Description
The Angels are charged with finding a pair of missing rings that are encoded with the personal information of members of the Witness Protection Program. As informants are killed, the ladies target a rogue agent who might be responsible.
Budget:
$120M
US Gross:
$100.83M
Worldwide:
$259.18M
Starring
Drew Barrymore
Actor
Lucy Liu
Actor
Cameron Diaz
Actor
Awards
Razzie Awards 2004
— Worst Sequel, Remake or Ripoff
Razzie Awards 2004
— Worst Supporting Actress
Razzie Awards 2004
— Worst Picture
MTV Movie & TV Awards 2004
— Best Action Scene
Razzie Awards 2004
— Worst Screenplay
MTV Movie & TV Awards 2004
— Best Villain
Razzie Awards 2004
— Worst Actress
Razzie Awards 2004
— Worst Attempt at a Relevant Film
MTV Movie & TV Awards 2004
— Best Dance
Key opinion
Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle is a divisive, high-octane spectacle that embraces its identity as a shallow, over-the-top parody. While fans of the original appreciate its vibrant energy, star-studded cameos, and improved stunts, critics argue that the sequel lacks substance and relies too heavily on repetitive formulas and cartoonish physics.
| Acting | The film utilizes an extensive roster of high-profile cameos, including Bruce Willis, Pink, and Matt LeBlanc, to provide consistent star power. | |
| Direction | The action sequences are technically ambitious and more elaborate than the first film, though they frequently abandon realism for physics-defying spectacle. | |
| Acting | Demi Moore’s performance as the villain is polarising, with some viewers praising her screen presence and fitness, while others find her acting limited or underwhelming. | |
| Humor | The film’s humor is highly subjective, alternating between effective, lighthearted comedy and juvenile, "toilet-level" jokes. | |
| Screenplay | The narrative repeats the shallow, formulaic structure of the first film, offering little innovation or substance beyond its kinetic visuals. |