← Back to results
Color of Night
1994 121 min United States of America R 18+
★5.2
Romance, Mystery, Thriller
Director: Richard Rush
Trailers
Description
A color-blind psychiatrist is stalked by an unknown killer after taking over his murdered friend's therapy group and becomes embroiled in an intense affair with a mysterious woman who may be connected to the crime.
Budget:
$40M
US Gross:
$19.73M
Worldwide:
$19.7M
Starring
Bruce Willis
Actor
Jane March
Actor
Rubén Blades
Actor
Awards
Razzie Awards 1995
— Worst Picture
Razzie Awards 1995
— Worst Screenplay
Golden Globe 1995
— Best Original Song
Razzie Awards 1995
— Worst Picture
Razzie Awards 1995
— Worst Actor
Razzie Awards 1995
— Worst Actress
Razzie Awards 1995
— Worst Song
Razzie Awards 1995
— Worst Screen Couple
Razzie Awards 1995
— Worst Supporting Actor
Razzie Awards 1995
— Worst Supporting Actress
Key opinion
Color of Night is a highly polarizing erotic thriller that remains a cult favorite for some while being dismissed as a failed Basic Instinct clone by others. While there is a strong consensus on the high quality of the soundtrack and the visual atmosphere, critics and audiences remain deeply divided over the film's narrative coherence and the efficacy of its central performances.
| Score | The film features a memorable, high-quality soundtrack that serves as a standout element, highlighted by the title track. | |
| Cinematography | The film utilizes striking, atmospheric cinematography and stylish lighting that successfully lean into the neo-noir aesthetic. | |
| Screenplay | The plot's complexity is divisive; supporters find the twists unpredictable and engaging, while detractors criticize the story as contrived, full of implausibilities, and derivative of Basic Instinct. | |
| Acting | Opinions on Bruce Willis's performance range from those who view it as a compelling departure from his typical action roles to those who find his portrayal wooden and lacking in range. | |
| Emotion | The chemistry between the leads and the execution of the erotic scenes are praised by fans as the film's most successful aspect, whereas critics view them as gratuitous or failing to elevate the narrative. | |
| Pacing | The pacing is a significant point of contention, with some viewers enjoying the contemplative, slow-burn tension, while others find the film boring, static, and overlong. |