← Back to results
Ed Wood
1994 127 min United States of America R 18+
★8.3
Comedy, Drama, History
Director: Tim Burton
Trailers
EN
EN
Description
The mostly true story of the legendary "worst director of all time", who, with the help of his strange friends, filmed countless B-movies without ever becoming famous or successful.
Budget:
$18M
US Gross:
$5.89M
Worldwide:
$5.9M
Starring
Johnny Depp
Actor
Martin Landau
Actor
Sarah Jessica Parker
Actor
Awards
Academy Awards 1995
— Best Supporting Actor
Academy Awards 1995
— Best Makeup and Hairstyling
Golden Globe 1995
— Best Supporting Actor
Academy Awards 1995
— Best Makeup and Hairstyling
Golden Globe 1995
— Best Supporting Actor
Golden Globe 1995
— Best Picture (Comedy or Musical)
Golden Globe 1995
— Best Actor (Comedy or Musical)
Cannes Film Festival 1995
— Palme d'Or
BAFTA 1996
— Best Makeup and Hairstyling
Saturn Awards 1995
— Best Actor
Saturn Awards 1995
— Best Original Score
Saturn Awards 1995
— Best Screenplay
Screen Actors Guild Awards 1995
— Best Supporting Actor
Key opinion
Ed Wood is widely celebrated as a poignant, stylish, and sincere tribute to the notoriously inept filmmaker, capturing his unwavering optimism and creative obsession. While some note minor historical inaccuracies, the film is universally praised for its exceptional performances and successful emulation of the 1950s aesthetic.
| Acting | Martin Landau's performance as Bela Lugosi is a standout, delivering a nuanced portrayal of fading stardom, loneliness, and late-life friendship. | |
| Acting | Johnny Depp captures Ed Wood’s manic enthusiasm and naive, relentless self-belief with great depth and charm. | |
| Cinematography | The black-and-white cinematography and authentic 1950s stylistic choices successfully immerse the audience in the era of B-movie horror. | |
| Score | Howard Shore’s score effectively evokes the low-budget horror and sci-fi aesthetic of the 1950s. | |
| Theme | The narrative accurately captures the struggles of independent filmmaking, including the practical difficulties of low-budget production, funding, and studio compromise. | |
| Adaptation | While the film is lauded for its heart and visual style, some viewers find the historical accuracy of biographical details and timelines to be occasionally flawed. | |
| Accessibility | The black-and-white presentation and the niche subject matter of a film about an obscure director may alienate some casual viewers accustomed to modern mainstream aesthetics. |