Trailers
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
Description
A story about bravery, self-sacrifice and human dignity put on trial by the merciless power of nature. A young pilot is fired from military air force after disobeying an absurd order. He gets a job as a co-pilot with a civil airline. Being brutally honest and direct, he is not on best terms with his new colleagues. During a flight to Asia his crew receives a distress message from a volcanic island and makes a decision to attempt a rescue mission. Will it be a success? Will they survive the disaster? They have a single chance to find that out: by being a team and sticking up for one another.
Starring
Awards
Key opinion
The 2016 film 'Ekipazh' is generally regarded as a polished, high-budget disaster spectacle that succeeds as a modern blockbuster while sparking debate as a remake. Opinions are deeply divided on its artistic merit, with supporters praising the tense second-act catastrophe and technical quality, while detractors dismiss the film as a hollow, formulaic imitation of Hollywood tropes.
| Production | The film features high-level production values, with many reviewers noting that the visual effects and CGI meet Western standards for spectacle. | |
| Acting | Daniil Kozlovsky and Vladimir Mashkov deliver compelling performances that provide emotional weight to the central mentor-protagonist dynamic. | |
| Pacing | The pacing is highly divisive, as the slow-burn, character-focused first hour is seen by some as unnecessary filler, while others find the explosive 90-minute disaster sequence gripping and well-sustained. | |
| Screenplay | The screenplay is viewed through conflicting lenses; proponents admire the human-centered narrative arcs, while critics argue the dialogue is simplistic and the plot relies on implausible stunts and clichés. | |
| Adaptation | The film's status as a remake is a major point of contention, with viewers polarized between those who appreciate it as a modern standalone reinterpretation and those who find it lacks the emotional depth and character complexity of the 1979 original. |