← Back to results
Following
1999 69 min United Kingdom, United States of America R 16+
★7.4
Drama, Thriller
Director: Christopher Nolan
Trailers
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
Description
Bill, an idle, unemployed aspiring writer, walks the crowded streets of London following randomly chosen strangers, a seemingly innocent entertainment that becomes dangerous when he crosses paths with a mysterious character.
Budget:
$6,000
US Gross:
$48,482
Worldwide:
$126,052
Starring
Jeremy Theobald
Actor
Alex Haw
Actor
Lucy Russell
Actor
Awards
5 wins & 4 nominations total
Key opinion
Christopher Nolan’s debut feature is widely regarded as a lean, ambitious neo-noir that successfully establishes his signature interest in non-linear storytelling and psychological manipulation. While some viewers find the character development or pacing lacking, most critics and fans praise the film as a testament to creative ingenuity, demonstrating how a shoestring budget can effectively mirror the complex structure of his later blockbusters.
| Originality | The film functions as a foundational blueprint for Nolan’s later career, explicitly introducing his trademark non-linear narrative structure and penchant for intricate, twist-heavy plotting. | |
| Cinematography | The striking black-and-white cinematography effectively leverages the film’s minimal budget to create a tense, atmospheric, and distinctly noir visual aesthetic. | |
| Runtime | The 70-minute runtime is viewed as a significant strength by most, keeping the storytelling brisk and avoiding the bloat often associated with modern thrillers. | |
| Acting | Performances by a cast of non-professional friends are largely seen as solid and compelling, with Alex Haw’s turn as the manipulative Cobb standing out as a highlight. | |
| Screenplay | Opinions on the screenplay are divided; proponents praise the tight, clever dialogue and suspenseful architecture, while detractors find the characters hollow and the premise unengaging. | |
| Pacing | The film’s pacing is a subject of debate: some viewers find the dialogue-heavy segments to be sluggish filler, whereas others find the rapid-fire progression immersive and complete. |