← Back to results
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1
2010 146 min United Kingdom, United States of America PG-13 12+
★7.9
Adventure, Fantasy
Director: David Yates
🎭 Based on
«Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows»
Trailers
EN
Teaser
Description
Harry, Ron and Hermione walk away from their last year at Hogwarts to find and destroy the remaining Horcruxes, putting an end to Voldemort's bid for immortality. But with Harry's beloved Dumbledore dead and Voldemort's unscrupulous Death Eaters on the loose, the world is more dangerous than ever.
Budget:
$250M
US Gross:
$296.37M
Worldwide:
$954.31M
Starring
Daniel Radcliffe
Actor
Emma Watson
Actor
Rupert Grint
Actor
Awards
MTV Movie & TV Awards 2011
— Best Villain
Saturn Awards 2011
— Best Director
Saturn Awards 2011
— Best Costume Design
MTV Movie & TV Awards 2011
— Best Kiss
Georges Awards 2011
— Best Foreign Action Film
Academy Awards 2011
— Best Production Design
Academy Awards 2011
— Best Visual Effects
MTV Movie & TV Awards 2011
— Best Villain
MTV Movie & TV Awards 2011
— Best Picture
MTV Movie & TV Awards 2011
— Best Actor
MTV Movie & TV Awards 2011
— Best Actress
MTV Movie & TV Awards 2011
— Best Fight
Saturn Awards 2011
— Best Fantasy Film
Georges Awards 2011
— Worst of the Year
Saturn Awards 2011
— Best Makeup and Hairstyling
BAFTA 2011
— Best Makeup and Hairstyling
Key opinion
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 is widely regarded as a visually stunning and emotionally mature conclusion that successfully shifts the franchise into darker, character-driven territory. While opinions diverge on the necessity of splitting the finale into two parts and the film's deliberate pacing, the consensus highlights the improved performances of the lead trio and the technical excellence of the production.
| Acting | The lead trio delivers their most professional and emotionally resonant performances to date. | |
| Production | Special effects and production design are consistently praised for their technical quality and atmosphere. | |
| Pacing | The film is criticized for lacking the dynamic momentum of previous entries and feeling incomplete due to the split-part structure. | |
| Screenplay | The decision to split the book into two films draws both praise for allowing more narrative breathing room and criticism for being a blatant, profit-driven move that slows the story. | |
| Score | The musical score is a point of contention, with some finding it subtle and effective, while others feel it lacks the memorability of the franchise's earlier themes. |