← Back to results
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
2009 153 min United Kingdom, United States of America PG 12+
★8.1
Adventure, Fantasy
Director: David Yates
🎭 Based on
«Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince»
Trailers
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
Teaser
Teaser
Description
Dumbledore tries to prepare Harry for the final battle with Voldemort while Death Eaters wreak havoc in both Muggle and Wizard worlds.
Budget:
$250M
US Gross:
$302.33M
Worldwide:
$933.96M
Starring
Daniel Radcliffe
Actor
Emma Watson
Actor
Rupert Grint
Actor
Awards
MTV Movie & TV Awards 2010
— Best Villain
MTV Movie & TV Awards 2010
— Best Picture
Saturn Awards 2010
— Best Fantasy Film
Saturn Awards 2010
— Best Costume Design
Saturn Awards 2010
— Best Production Design
BAFTA 2010
— Best Visual Effects
MTV Movie & TV Awards 2010
— Best Actor
Georges Awards 2010
— Best Foreign Action Film
MTV Movie & TV Awards 2010
— Best Villain
MTV Movie & TV Awards 2010
— Best Actress
Saturn Awards 2010
— Best Visual Effects
BAFTA 2010
— Best Production Design
Key opinion
David Yates' sixth installment in the Harry Potter series is a polarizing entry that prioritizes character-driven maturity and teenage melodrama over the original book's complex plot. While many critics and fans praise the actors' growth and the film's visual atmosphere, others criticize the heavy narrative omissions and the shift toward a superficial teen-romance focus.
| Acting | The trio of Radcliffe, Grint, and Watson demonstrates clear growth, with their long-term embodiment of the characters yielding convincing chemistry and professional maturity. | |
| Theme | The film effectively uses its runtime to build anticipation for the finale, successfully establishing the stakes of the Horcrux hunt and deepening the emotional bond between Dumbledore and Harry. | |
| Adaptation | The screenplay is widely criticized for gutting essential source material—such as backstories, the Prince's subplot, and the Dumbledore funeral—to make room for excessive focus on adolescent romances. | |
| Runtime | The two-and-a-half-hour runtime is a point of contention: supporters appreciate the deliberate, contemplative pace, while detractors find the narrative bloated and the middle sections sluggish. | |
| Emotion | Opinions on the tone are split; some argue that shifting the focus to teenage hormones and humor provides a necessary human grounding, while others feel it strips the film of the danger, dark atmosphere, and tension inherent in the book. |