← Back to results
How to Train Your Dragon
2025 125 min United States of America PG 12+
★7.6
Fantasy, Family, Action, Adventure
Director: Dean DeBlois
🎭 Based on
«How to Train Your Dragon»
byCressida Cowell
Trailers
EN
EN
EN
EN
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Description
On the rugged isle of Berk, where Vikings and dragons have been bitter enemies for generations, Hiccup stands apart, defying centuries of tradition when he befriends Toothless, a feared Night Fury dragon. Their unlikely bond reveals the true nature of dragons, challenging the very foundations of Viking society.
Budget:
$150M
US Gross:
$262.96M
Worldwide:
$636.35M
Starring
Mason Thames
Actor
Nico Parker
Actor
Gerard Butler
Actor
Awards
BAFTA 2026
— Best Visual Effects
Key opinion
The 2025 remake of 'How to Train Your Dragon' is widely praised for its high-quality production design and visual effects, which successfully ground the animation's fantasy world in a gritty, realistic aesthetic. While opinions on the film's necessity and its casting choices remain polarized, most agree that it serves as a technically impressive, faithful adaptation of the original story.
| Production | The production design and CGI effectively transform the animated dragons and Viking landscapes into a grounded, immersive, and realistic world. | |
| Acting | Gerard Butler delivers a standout performance, providing necessary emotional weight and authority to the role of Stoick. | |
| Adaptation | The film functions as a near shot-for-shot remake that captures the original's spirit, though it struggles to justify its existence as an unnecessary re-adaptation of a relatively recent film. | |
| Pacing | The film's pacing and humor are viewed inconsistently; while some find the action lively and brisk, others feel the live-action translation loses the expressive nuance and comedic timing of the original animation. | |
| Culture | Casting choices, particularly regarding character diversity and the departure from the original's character designs, spark significant debate regarding the film's creative direction and perceived ideological shifts. | |
| Emotion | The emotional core of the film is viewed differently, with some finding it a heartwarming, nostalgic successor, while others argue it lacks the warmth and soul of the 2010 original. |