← Back to results
JFK
1991 189 min United States of America, France R 16+
★8.4
Drama, Thriller, History
Director: Oliver Stone
🎭 Based on
«On the Trail of the Assassins»
byJim Garrison
Trailers
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
Description
Follows the investigation into the assassination of President John F. Kennedy led by New Orleans district attorney Jim Garrison.
Budget:
$40M
US Gross:
$70.41M
Worldwide:
$205.41M
Starring
Kevin Costner
Actor
Gary Oldman
Actor
Jack Lemmon
Actor
Awards
Academy Awards 1992
— Best Cinematography
Academy Awards 1992
— Best Film Editing
BAFTA 1993
— Best Sound
Academy Awards 1992
— Best Cinematography
BAFTA 1993
— Best Adapted Screenplay
Academy Awards 1992
— Best Picture
Academy Awards 1992
— Best Film Editing
BAFTA 1993
— Best Sound
Academy Awards 1992
— Best Sound
Academy Awards 1992
— Best Director
BAFTA 1993
— Best Film Editing
Academy Awards 1992
— Best Adapted Screenplay
Academy Awards 1992
— Best Original Score
Golden Globe 1992
— Best Director
Golden Globe 1992
— Best Picture (Drama)
Golden Globe 1992
— Best Actor (Drama)
Golden Globe 1992
— Best Screenplay
Key opinion
Oliver Stone's JFK is a polarizing, ambitious dramatization that uses innovative editing to blend documentary footage with conspiracy-laden narrative. While the ensemble cast is widely praised, the film's intense length and Kevin Costner’s central performance remain subjects of significant debate among viewers and critics.
| Editing | The film utilizes highly innovative editing to seamlessly integrate archival footage with dramatized sequences, creating a compelling pseudo-documentary style. | |
| Acting | The extensive supporting cast, particularly Tommy Lee Jones and Gary Oldman, provides strong, immersive performances that anchor the complex narrative. | |
| Accessibility | The film demands prior historical knowledge of the assassination, as its dense narrative structure and investigative focus are aimed specifically at well-informed viewers. | |
| Acting | Kevin Costner's portrayal of Jim Garrison is divisive; some see it as a grounded, understated performance, while others find him lacking the necessary intensity and charisma for the lead role. | |
| Pacing | Opinions on the three-hour-plus runtime are split; proponents feel the pacing is tight and necessary for the depth of the investigation, while detractors find it sluggish and exhausting. | |
| Ending | The final courtroom monologue is contentious, viewed by some as a persuasive, powerful climax, while others find it anticlimactic and lacking in emotional resolution. |