← Back to results
Kung Fu Panda 3
2016 95 min China, United States of America PG 6+
★7.3
Animation, Action, Adventure, Comedy, Family
Director: Alessandro Carloni, Jennifer Yuh Nelson
Trailers
EN
EN
EN
Description
While Po and his father are visiting a secret panda village, an evil spirit threatens all of China, forcing Po to form a ragtag army to fight back.
Budget:
$145M
US Gross:
$143.53M
Worldwide:
$521.17M
Starring
Jack Black
Actor
Bryan Cranston
Actor
Dustin Hoffman
Actor
Awards
MTV Movie & TV Awards 2016
Saturn Awards 2016
— Best Animated Feature
Key opinion
Kung Fu Panda 3 is generally regarded as a visually stunning and entertaining conclusion to the trilogy, successfully balancing lighthearted humor with themes of identity and self-discovery. While many viewers appreciate its emotional depth and vibrant animation, the film is divisive regarding its narrative structure, with some critics finding the plot formulaic or overly reliant on magic compared to the more grounded martial arts focus of the predecessors.
| Production | The animation quality remains top-tier, featuring vibrant visuals and artistic sequences that maintain the high standards of the franchise. | |
| Score | The musical score by Hans Zimmer is widely celebrated for enhancing the film's atmosphere and emotional resonance. | |
| Acting | The voice acting remains a consistent strength, with returning veterans and newcomers delivering reliable performances that ground the characters. | |
| Originality | The shift toward supernatural elements and 'Chi' magic divides opinions; some find it a compelling evolution of Po's journey, while others view it as a departure from the franchise's grounded martial arts roots. | |
| Screenplay | The narrative structure is subject to debate, as some viewers praise the emotional payoff of the parent-child arcs, while others criticize the screenplay for being formulaic, rushed, or filler-heavy. | |
| Humor | The humor generates conflicting reactions, with some finding it charming and seamless, while others feel it relies on repetitive slapstick and falls short of the wit found in the earlier entries. |