← Back to results
Nocturnal Animals
2016 116 min United States of America, China, United Kingdom R 18+
★7.6
Drama, Thriller
Director: Tom Ford
🎭 Based on
«Tony and Susan»
byAustin Wright
Trailers
EN
EN
EN
Teaser
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
Description
Susan Morrow receives a book manuscript from her ex-husband – a man she left 20 years earlier – asking for her opinion of his writing. As she reads, she is drawn into the fictional life of Tony Hastings, a mathematics professor whose family vacation turns violent.
Budget:
$22.5M
US Gross:
$10.66M
Worldwide:
$29.3M
Starring
Amy Adams
Actor
Jake Gyllenhaal
Actor
Michael Shannon
Actor
Awards
Golden Globe 2017
— Best Supporting Actor
Venice Film Festival 2016
— Special Jury Prize
BAFTA 2017
— Best Production Design
Screen Actors Guild Awards 2017
— Best Stunt Ensemble
Golden Globe 2017
— Best Director
Venice Film Festival 2016
— Golden Lion
Golden Globe 2017
— Best Supporting Actor
Golden Globe 2017
— Best Screenplay
Venice Film Festival 2016
— Special Jury Prize
BAFTA 2017
— Best Actor
BAFTA 2017
— Best Supporting Actor
BAFTA 2017
— Best Adapted Screenplay
BAFTA 2017
— Best Cinematography
BAFTA 2017
— Best Film Editing
BAFTA 2017
— Best Original Score
BAFTA 2017
— David Lean Award for Direction
Key opinion
Nocturnal Animals is a visually arresting, high-concept thriller that polarizes audiences with its blend of meta-narrative storytelling and cold, calculated aesthetic. While many praise the lead performances and the film's atmospheric intensity, others feel the style masks a hollow emotional core and a predictable narrative payoff.
| Acting | Michael Shannon delivers a standout, authoritative performance that provides much-needed dramatic weight to the film's narrative. | |
| Cinematography | The cinematography is masterfully composed, utilizing precise color palettes and lighting to establish a mood of deliberate unease. | |
| Screenplay | The dual-narrative structure effectively bridges the gap between reality and fiction, though its success depends on the viewer's willingness to engage with metaphorical subtext. | |
| Pacing | The film's pacing is polarizing; those who appreciate the contemplative, slow-burn atmosphere find it immersive, while others view it as a pretentious and exhausting exercise in style over substance. | |
| Ending | The climax and conclusion are divisive, with some viewers finding the ending a powerful, resonant resolution, and others dismissing it as predictable or lacking in genuine mystery. |