← Back to results
The First Omen
2024 119 min United States of America R 18+
★6.7
Horror
Director: Arkasha Stevenson
Trailers
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
Teaser
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
Description
When a young American woman is sent to Rome to begin a life of service to the church, she encounters a darkness that causes her to question her own faith and uncovers a terrifying conspiracy that hopes to bring about the birth of evil incarnate.
Budget:
$30M
US Gross:
$20.09M
Worldwide:
$53.99M
Starring
Nell Tiger Free
Actor
Ralph Ineson
Actor
Sonia Braga
Actor
Awards
Saturn Awards 2025
— Best Horror Film
Key opinion
The First Omen is a visually striking and atmospheric prequel that succeeds as a technical debut for Arkasha Stevenson, though it divides audiences regarding its narrative necessity. While many praise Nell Tiger Free's central performance and the film's production design, critics and viewers remain split on whether the story meaningfully adds to the franchise or feels like an uninspired, derivative retread.
| Acting | Nell Tiger Free delivers a powerful, transformative performance that anchors the film and elevates the material. | |
| Production | The film utilizes grotesque, high-quality practical effects and a menacing visual style to craft a strong, unsettling atmosphere. | |
| Direction | Arkasha Stevenson demonstrates confident, capable direction, particularly in her ability to maintain suspense and tension. | |
| Pacing | The pacing is a point of contention: some appreciate the slow-burn, contemplative build-up, while others find the two-hour runtime to be a tedious, stretched-out slog. | |
| Screenplay | Opinions are divided on the screenplay's value; some see it as a clever expansion of franchise lore, whereas others view it as a derivative, predictable, and unnecessary revision of the established narrative. | |
| Ending | The ending creates a rift among viewers; some find the connection to the 1976 original to be a satisfying homage, while others label it a safe and underwhelming conclusion. |