← Back to results
The Voice of Hind Rajab
صوت هند رجب
2025 89 min France, Tunisia, United States of America, United Kingdom, Cyprus, Saudi Arabia, Italy, Netherlands 12+
★8.3
Drama, History
Director: Kaouther Ben Hania
Trailers
Description
January 29, 2024. Red Crescent volunteers receive an emergency call. A five-year old girl is trapped in a car under fire in Gaza, pleading for rescue. While trying to keep her on the line, they do everything they can to get an ambulance to her. Her name was Hind Rajab.
US Gross:
$955,679
Worldwide:
$5.06M
Starring
Saja Kilani
Actor
Motaz Malhees
Actor
Amer Hlehel
Actor
Awards
Venice Film Festival 2025
— Arca CinemaGiovani Award – Best Film (Youth Jury)
Venice Film Festival 2025
— Special Jury Prize
Venice Film Festival 2025
— UNESCO and CIFEJ Award
European Film Awards 2026
— Best Sound
Academy Awards 2026
— Best International Feature Film
Golden Globe 2026
— Best International Feature Film
Venice Film Festival 2025
— UNESCO and CIFEJ Award
BAFTA 2026
— Best International Feature Film
Key opinion
The Voice of Hind Rajab is a harrowing and emotionally taxing dramatization of a real-life tragedy in Gaza, praised for its raw impact and use of authentic audio recordings. While the film is widely recognized as a powerful humanitarian indictment, opinions on its cinematic execution remain divided between those who see it as a necessary document and those who find the technical production and narrative focus problematic.
| Emotion | The use of Hind Rajab's authentic audio recordings creates a sense of palpable terror and profound emotional weight that anchors the film. | |
| Theme | The narrative effectively condemns the cold, bureaucratic red tape that paralyzes humanitarian rescue efforts during active conflict. | |
| Acting | The performances by the cast portraying the Red Crescent staff provide a grounded, human perspective on the helplessness of distant emergency responders. | |
| Originality | The blending of documentary audio with fictionalized reenactment divides critics: some view it as a necessary tool for empathy, while others argue it exploits the tragedy or lacks cinematic credibility. | |
| Editing | Technical production elements like handheld camera work and editing are criticized by some for being distracting or rushed, whereas others feel they contribute to the film's chaotic, high-stakes atmosphere. | |
| Ending | The abrupt ending is seen by some as a failure to provide sufficient closure or accountability, diminishing the film's final impact. |